|
|
|
|
|
by newaccount74
1567 days ago
|
|
> > some clever base between 1 and 2 > I wouldn't have thought of it, nor known how to. Would it be somehow costly ? Shifting is basically free. Multiplying by 1.5 is a shift and an add, so just as cheap. Multiplying by 1.5 has the advantage that 1 + 1.5 > 1.5 * 1.5, so the second time you realloc it fits into the old memory (which can help reduce memory fragmentation if the allocator takes advantage of it). |
|
I’m really struggling to think of any mainstream allocator that can take advantage of this.