[murtali]

Three metrics you pointed out: 1. Linter 2. Cyclomatic/halstead complexity 3. identifier naming convention testing

Are those really things that candidates can get a negative ding for? Those are things that can/should be handled automatically by libraries or your CI/CD (ex: Rubocop)

More importantly, how do you get more details/nuance over things like naming or cyclomatic complexity.

[moritonal]

I actually really value the naming metric. I'd value a dev who looks at other classes to to see what the convention is rather than just adding their own personal form of camel-case. It shows a sense of collaboration.