|
|
|
|
|
by blyry
1559 days ago
|
|
At my first job I had a more experienced coworker, and I couldn't understand why he wrote code the way he did. Copy pasted stuff everywhere, never added abstractions, stuff was 30 lines when it could've been 5 and a base class. Yaknow what? He got 10x the amount of work done that I did. 'perfect' doesn't mean 'pure, clean, never needing to be rethought', 'perfect' to him meant 'meets requirements'. 99% of the time, none of his code ever needed to be touched again and if it did need to be touched..it was easy and rote to update because it was easy to understand and simple to modify. less is more, but the 'less' applies to abstractions, not loc. Just because you CAN take something to the next level, or iterate one more time till it feels right, doesn't mean you should or that there's value in doing so. |
|
Their code was full of bugs which they fixed immediately, causing silent regressions. They never wrote tests.
The other 5 places they had copy pasted that buggy code still remained buggy.
Also whenever they spaghetti code themselves into a corner, they spent 10x longer refactoring stuff as a result.
In effect, it's not that they got 10x work done, it's that they make everyone else get 10x less done.