|
|
|
|
|
|
by zeeg
5370 days ago
|
|
|
Ah ok that's what I figured. We do a lot of the same things right now with various DBs (we just describe it as pre-sharding so we can avoid the actual re-sharding dilemma). We've had to do this with both PostgreSQL and Redis now. The schemas are definitely a neat way to handle this though so you dont have to worry about table names. |
|
|