| > I checked out RT once and found it to be full of I am sorry, but then I question your qualification on that. RT is pretty solid. The user comments on the site are quite bad, but that's it. The content itself is of a higher journalistic standard than what you can expect in its Western counterparts. Sorry, no offence, but you shouldn't make statements, such as those you made, when you are barely familiar with the medium. I am pretty familiar with RT and while I am not sure I'd agree with everything they say, their content is much less biased than what you get from the BBC and alike - and that is taking into account that the Russian government will certainly have an influence. > RT has not been banned in the UK. (YouTube is not the UK). Yes it has. Why would Youtube censor RT in the UK but not in other places? Obviously the governments were involved. Point is, RT has been censored in the UK and the EU. > Assange was not imprisoned for “fake news”. So you are saying he was imprisoned for "proper news"? Even worse. |