[the_af]

> Creating a long fake is riskier than a short fake. Making mistakes is a risk, and so the more content the more risk.

But this isn't really a long piece. It's very short in actual content, only padded with prose.

And what exactly is the risk anyway? That someone will identify it as Ukrainian disinformation? That's very low stakes, which we know because it has already happened with other bits of "info".

[petre]

The Kadyrov FSB leak being Ukranian counter information is quite plausible. Maybe they got tipped off by NATO and after neutralizing the chechens, they claimed it was a FSB leak.