This just seems to be a case of Not Invented Here syndrome. Using gitolite or gitosis would have done the job faster, gives you the ability to have acl's set up per user and all of it uses simple configuration files.
To be fair, the example I have given is simple and you could use something like gitosis or gitolite (I have used them in the past). The point of the article was supposed to be a starting point if you have something else you want to do. For example, I needed to have a fully distributed git backend system across multiple git storage nodes so I needed to learn how I would go about doing that. This post was supposed to give the reader the tools they need to roll their own solution if they want.
Agreed. Or for small trusted teams any linux box with ssh access will do fine. This is a very well served product area, it really shouldn't be a problem that demands new software development.
Edit: Hah! That's basically what it is, just dressed up with a tiny script and the two-factor trick from last week. Never mind then. This is sane. Just maybe oversold.
NIH or not, I enjoyed reading this post. It showed the simplicity of serving git repos and walked readers through the entire process top to bottom.
Gitolite is a great project and it has many useful features such as branch-level access control. That might be what he meant by "overkill". He simply didn't need those features. I think there's much to be said for keeping things simple.