[px43]

How about you type up a response to them, and if you phrase it better than I did, and get the message across more clearly that I did, then I'll delete my post and you can get all the attention?

I did my darnedest when writing that post, and I don't really think your meta-commentary is adding to the discussion.

[archerx]

People should be able to watch what they want without a midwit nanny policing their thoughts. Have you submitted your application to run the ministry of truth yet?

If you don’t understand how this kind of thinking is bad for the people and good for those in power I suggest you go and do some reading.

[mohanmcgeek]

The current "moderation" is in line with their opinion and they don't want to imagine what will happen when that changes.

And YouTube gets no love because they also removed the dislike button (which is a much more robust way of moderation) because they didn't like the outcome

[anon2020dot00]

It's not about the phrasing but about the message.

How can it not be condescending to say "30% to 40% of people don't have enough intelligence to filter propaganda". Whether that's true or not is debatable but there's no phrasing it better.

[mohanmcgeek]

Perhaps if you dropped your arrogance you would realise that other people in the thread don't share your opinion and don't want to get the same message across more clearly?

You and YouTube seem to share the same sentiment that you somehow are smarter in every way than the said 30-40% of the population.