[verdverm]

Why are you stuck on this idea that Elon is Satoshi? All of your evidence is very flimsy.

How many people say factor of 10, order of magnitude, and bloody? Why have you not considered them as potential Satoshis?

You previously asked this and got a similar response.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30441927

[sahil50]

The evidence pointing to Elon being Satoshi spans every important dimension of identifying someone. Capability, motivation, linguistics, physical location. This is the most robust consilience of evidence of Satoshi anywhere on the internet.

This is a proposal. You are welcome to propose another candidates. Now it up to open-minded people to rank all proposals by likelihood of being true.

[verdverm]

No, you are already convinced and saying things most people think are crazy, making conspiracy theory like connections.

You lose respect and credibility by doing so. You may wish to think about how others think about what your statements say about you

[sahil50]

You have previously posted about Wolfram's New Kind of Science. So I think you understand what it means to have original thoughts and go against the status quo.

[verdverm]

Yes, but that is not an absolute thing. Consider supporting Russia right now and how going against the status quo would harm you.

Again, I urge you to consider how your statements and claims are seen by others. What is the primary pattern across your "elon is satoshi" posts

[sahil50]

- Capability

- Motivation

- Linguistics

- Physical location

This is the most robust consilience of evidence of Satoshi anywhere on the internet.