[isomel]

There are already plenty of GUI solutions for rust. All with a diverse level of polishing and convenience.

[rapsey]

A diverse level of incompleteness you mean. Nothing comparable to Qt exists.

[isomel]

Exactly. But there are already bindings to Qt in different states. Let's see if this one bring anything.

[nu11ptr]

AFAIK, the only complete desktop GUI option for Rust that is viable for large, professional apps is gtk-rs. There are many promising up and coming GUIs for hobby projects, but none I've seen are robust enough (yet) to support all needed widgets of a pro app.

[Macha]

Accessibility support is the big killer for many of them, though even GTK has issues with that on Mac OS, so Qt would be a big win.

Or I guess you could put a Rust wasm app into electron also and have accessibility support that way. Has to be one that uses a real DOM and not just renders to a canvas or WebGL though.

[ogoffart]

I think you can go quite far with Qt/QML and the qmetaobject crate. For example https://github.com/gyroflow/gyroflow

[nu11ptr]

Ahh...very cool, thx. Didn't realize it was that capable and was not aware of this "demo". I will check it out as I need to write a GUI soon (and would prefer to use Rust).

[wongarsu]

There are plenty of GUI solutions that are robust enough for an embedded GUI or some WebAssembly stuff. For native (desktop) applications the rust ecosystem still has a long way to go.

[the__alchemist]

Yea - `embedded-graphics` is nice for embedded primatives and text.