Yes. I see this is a problem. In 1930's Germany these kind of referendums(fraudulent?) made the world-wide catastrophe.
Anyway it is fundamentally(?) always the majority who agrees on the rules. And the majority chooses how to advocate for minorities (one of which could be a terrorist organization).
So in case there are bloody coins on the blockchain - the majority has two options:
Anyway it is fundamentally(?) always the majority who agrees on the rules. And the majority chooses how to advocate for minorities (one of which could be a terrorist organization).
So in case there are bloody coins on the blockchain - the majority has two options:
- collaborate with terrorists (do nothing)
- freeze the coins