Is the assumption that just because SBF made money, it must have been through "some evil"? What's the basis for that assumption (versus anything else, like ICOing a new token).
Nah the assumption that they made money in crypto which is just a cesspool of fraud, grift and crime - is what gives some folks the assumption that it could have been through fraud, grift or crime.
You hang out in the muck, folks are going to assume you have some on you.
I'm not saying they do necessarily, just that that's where the assumption more than likely comes from.
You hang out in the muck, folks are going to assume you have some on you.
I'm not saying they do necessarily, just that that's where the assumption more than likely comes from.