|
|
|
|
|
by lscdlscd
1570 days ago
|
|
It doesn't have to be that granular. If one engineer is getting (deservedly) paid 50% more than another in the same role, the company owes it to that engineer to give them a title/role that reflects their merit/contributions, at the very least for their career progression. |
|
Instead of offering to pay you less, company suggests you apply for a less valuable role (or demotes you), and then pays you less.
Instead of offering to pay you more, company suggests you apply for a more valuable role (or promotes you), and then pays you more.
If a company is trying to lowball or discriminate, they'll just do it by title and wage, instead of just wage.
If a company is trying negotiate in good faith, it's made the process needlessly complex.
I don't see what problem this solves.