|
|
|
|
|
by Melio
1576 days ago
|
|
You do ignore science on purpose? Are you not aware that the fuel for nuklear is limited? Do you ignore how cheap renewable is and how much nuklear is subsidiest? Do you not care that no nuklear power operator has limited liability which means the costs of accidents are paid by all of us? Is there anything of a real argument you can provide to proof your 'cashgrab shit against the naive hippies' statement? |
|
All renewables available to us are considered supplementary (they generate power when conditions are favorable, eg. wind blows, sun is shining). But this means they can’t be used to maintain power grid.
Ofc you can try hydro or geothermal, but those depend on your river network, underground warm waters availability, as well as population density around country. Those work for country like Norway but in practice German increasingly relies on French nuclear power as systemic source to maintain their grid, and Poland (sadly) sticks to coal and gas.