[Spooky23]

Because it’s based on regulated actuarial science, not explicit bias.

Marketing methods are often a little more fuzzy and less ethical than the actual underwriting. Insurers and marketers know about all sort of stuff that affects insurability, from eating habits, to gun ownership, to participation in high risk activity.

I don’t necessarily understand what Tinder does precisely, but it’s pretty obvious that you can exploit the insecurity or desperation of people looking for dates. It’s gonna be easier to extract cash from a 45 year old divorced woman than a 25 year old single woman. And you may want to use tolls as a friction point to reduce the number of undesirable or less profitable men.

You can probably use willingness to pay as a factor to score matches that will generate more churn that keeps the subscription in place. Generally speaking, I expect the most evil imaginable from companies like this. Online dating is a real mill, especially when you pass the threshold where you’re not attached and most people in your cohort are.

[kevin_thibedeau]

> And you may want to use tolls as a friction point to reduce the number of undesirable or less profitable men.

May as well just ban the sub-180 midgets who are wasting their time. Then charge a premium for having a choice pool of candidates for the other half.