|
|
|
|
|
by pawelos
1573 days ago
|
|
> NATO does not want a member country directly on the Russian border There are already two NATO countries directly on the Russian border. Four if you count Kaliningrad. Five if Finland joins. Edit: I’ve looked at the map and it turns out Norway also borders Russia, so +1 to all the calculations :) |
|
This map [1] puts the size of the borders in perspective and also why Russia has made Belarus effectively a client state. And also why Georgia is in a similar position as a buffer between Russia and Turkey.
But Ukraine is of particular strategic importance to Russia not only because of the expansive border but because Ukraine is relatively flat. Here's a map of the Operation Barbarossa invasion route [2]. It was largely through what is now Belarus to the north and Ukraine to the south.
I can't find a similar map but I believe Napoleon followed a similar route.
While niether of these two campaigns were successful, quite famously, it's merely a function of geography.
Additionally, Ukraine's position is even more significant because it potentially threaten's Russia's access to the Black Sea and the occupited territory of Crimea.
[1]: https://www.nationsonline.org/maps/countries_europe_map-L.jp...
[2]: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/11/Marcks_P...