[flotzam]

But how does any of that apply to the supposed "Steam purchases with stolen credit cards by way of Bitcoin" scheme?

[mr_cyborg]

1. Stolen money is used to buy bitcoin

2. Bitcoin is obfuscated by purchasing things online with it

3. Those online assets can be sold for cash

[candiddevmike]

1. Make a bunch of illegitimate money

2. Release some shitty game on steam that no one will play

3. Buy millions of copies of said shitty game with your illegitimate money using Bitcoin

4. Your illegitimate money is now revenue from your shitty game and can be taxed (Profit)

[flotzam]

The obfuscation in step 2 seems very superficial. Like, is the IRS not going to ask where you got your stacks of Steam codes from?

[rosndo]

Your bank will probably be the first one to ask, lying is a felony. (As is money laundering, of course)

Also Valve will be looking for this too, as required by their bank.

This is an incredibly unrealistic money laundering scheme, entirely fabricated by mr_cyborg.

The truth is that the “fraudulent transactions” here are double-spends, because Steam was accepting 0-conf payments in an unsafe way.

[anonymousab]

> This is an incredibly unrealistic money laundering scheme, entirely fabricated by mr_cyborg.

Using stolen money to buy gift cards, using those gift cards to buy real things and then selling those real objects or licenses or accounts after the fact is a well known process. Substituting "bitcoin" or any cryptocurrency for "gift card" is neither unreasonable nor unrealistic.

[rosndo]

This only makes sense where “stolen money” is money that you don’t actually control, such as stolen credit cards where the transactions will inevitably be charged back. In that case it does make sense to buy and sell gift cards in order to “cash out” the money.

This does not make any sense in the context of bitcoin.