|
|
|
|
|
by HWR_14
1569 days ago
|
|
> Youtube gets roughly 30,000 hours of content uploaded to it every hour. They Clearly you wouldn't need to review all of it. You could use AI to identify things for review (as opposed to remove them), limit it to people with a number of downvotes or views. Hell, you could just pay people to handle the reviews/escalations/appeals. Although, Google totally could afford it. It would cost less than 2.5% of their profits to pay US minimum wage to review every video. |
|
So you think employing those hundreds of thousands of workers would incur no office space costs, no IT system costs, no management, no service staff, no HR, no payroll, no recruitment, no training. Wow. And your talking about Google profits, but YouTube is a business itself that needs to make money. Why does the rest of Google need to subsidise it?