|
|
|
|
|
by stinkytaco
1570 days ago
|
|
This assumes a rapid, catastrophic collapse, which seems unlikely. Possible, but unlikely. More likely are localized disasters and gradual, sometimes imperceptible decline. These things have trickle-down impacts (migration, food shortages, etc) but are generally unlikely to trigger full on survival scenarios for most people. This isn't to say our industrialized food chain isn't problematic, it certainly is, but a gun is less likely to aid most people in day to day survival. |
|
The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists recently set the Doomsday clock to 100s to midnight.