|
|
|
|
|
by shiomiru
1569 days ago
|
|
It seems to me that they're explicitly asking how this tool is more comfortable to use than w3m. Not sure how browser market share has anything to do with that. This tool being specialized to do this one job doesn't mean it's automatically better at it than one with a wider range of functions. For example, in a Wikipedia-only browser you can't open references (without using another application) which arguably results in worse UX. |
|