|
|
|
|
|
by Sohcahtoa82
1569 days ago
|
|
> The solution is real free markets. A ludicrous suggestion. The "free market" optimizes for one single thing: Profit. Providing housing for homeless people is not profitable, and so a free market would never do it. > Constant government intervention in the housing market, the stock market, education, healthcare, and everything else under the sun has led us to where we are today. Health care is in the same boat. If a poor person gets cancer, the free market would gladly let them die. They wouldn't be able to pay for treatment. Education is similar. If the government didn't provide schools, a considerable portion of children would go uneducated. |
|
So the obvious question is how you balance those negative effects against the positive. This is where regulations and governments have to step in, though that certain has it's own massive issues.
Health care has a lot of unsolved problems, from my perspective no group is actually doing well (Just varying shades of bad, I'm from the UK). There are so many ailments that can't currently be treated well (Despite having spent decades studying them, though that seems to be a systematic failure of academia)