Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by bryanrasmussen 1576 days ago
thanks, I suppose the NATO problem is that as the sole purpose of the forming of NATO was to act as a deterrent and implicit threat to the Soviet Union having a possible NATO country next to Russia itself, as opposed to having some buffer is seen as aggressive in itself?
2 comments

Pure speculation, but maybe it’s calculated aggression based on an assumption that the west doesn’t have an appetite for war [with Russia] and will avoid doing so if possible.
That’s what Hitler counted on when he invaded Czechoslovakia.
And it seems that both were not incorrect.
How so? Hitler got away with it. The Allies declared war on him only nine months later when he also invaded Poland.

And even then, they only did it half-heartedly, and the French pretty much threw away their weapons when the first German panzers arrived. Hitler knew that he had the stronger will to fight. Had it not been for a few other factors (Churchill, Russian winter, and the Hitler's obsession with the jews), he could have taken the whole of Europe.

Exactly, Hitler was not incorrect in his assumption that the West did not have an appetite for war. He got away with it.
Oh, sorry. I had not seen the "not" in your original comment.