|
|
|
|
|
by amusedcyclist
1579 days ago
|
|
I don't think its seen as a trade, plenty of people in tech have PhDs or other degrees which are significantly more difficult than those required for finance, law or media. Its just more meritocratic than those fields which rely heavily on nepotism. So even if it pays well, its not seen as a marker of class like some of those are, which is a great thing imo. Tech is also significantly less white and full of immigrants (because of the meritocracy) which contributes to it not being a marker of class but of merit. |
|
That's quite a self-serving narrative for us on HN. Do we have any evidence that the degrees are harder to get or that tech is more meritocratic?
> Tech is also significantly less white and full of immigrants (because of the meritocracy)
Tech's diversity record isn't evidence of meritocracy. Compare women in law, business, and media and those in tech, for example. It also may be that law, business, and media require exceptional cultural communication and understanding, which may be hard for a new immigrant to learn.