[akomtu]

With the current state of things with news agencies, we need to assume these are carefully handpicked facts that give a false impression. Those 50 billions likely come with lots of strings attached and USPS can't just use 5 billions per year; the bill was riddled with irrelevant provisions that have nothing to do with mail, and that senator's vote didnt really decide anything. Need to verify all this to make any conclusions.

[CameronNemo]

we need to assume these are carefully handpicked facts that give a false impression

Reuters and AP are some of the most unbiased and professional news sources that cover US politics. If you are going to spread uncertainty and doubt about what I consider to be comprehensive reporting on this bill, I expect you to back it up with actual evidence.