|
|
|
|
|
by cogman10
1578 days ago
|
|
I mean, at the end of the day ReiserFS offers very little special compared to the other options already in the kernel. It never had a huge install base and has always been a major maintenance burden on the kernel. AFAIK, BTRFS has everything Reiser has with a far better maintenance and ongoing feature expansion. Really, the only reason to use reiser at this point is because you are dealing with data that you can't, for some reason, move to a new filesystem yet you still want to have updates to the kernel. |
|