|
|
|
|
|
by DerArzt
1581 days ago
|
|
As a layperson who doesn't know a whole lot about investing, this sounds like a ponzi scheme. The way that I am interpreting this is that if I were to invest in one of these (i.e. Maker) then the returns that I would see are there purely because other people are investing in it. That is close to what most stocks do, but at least with stocks in a company the value is not driven by the mechanism by which it is traded alone, but also by the decisions and profitability that the stocks are backing. |
|
That's the opposite of what I'm saying. The returns are from other people using the platform, not from investors in it. For Maker, using the platform means borrowing. For Uniswap, the returns are from a small % fee on trades. It's exactly analogous to a traditional company.