|
|
|
|
|
by anonporridge
1578 days ago
|
|
I agree. If anything, a nation state would likely have to deputize AWS to run the attack. But also, this would a purely destructive attack. A 51% attack isn't something that would ever allow a single entity to actually take control of the network, because you either a) obliterate public confidence and crash the value of the token, making mining a pure cost and the network worthless, or b) you incentivize the honest network participants to fork the network away from your computational dominance, leaving you with a ton of wasted money and possibly a worthless fleet of miners. |
|