|
|
|
|
|
by arubania2
1571 days ago
|
|
I don’t think the parent was suggesting that companies stay remote _because_ the employees don’t need interaction. (IMO companies stay this way because it’s simply cheaper and the hiring pool is bigger, but that’s not important in this discussion) It just happens to benefit those whose prefer to stay at home. |
|
In the US, this is only a benefit to bigger businesses or businesses with a presence in multiple states already (or those willing to take on quite a bit of new administrative work).
I work for a 15-person remote company based in a single state and the additional overhead required to understand taxation, labor laws, and other issues in even neighboring states is higher than you might think. We're putting it off and just hiring locally for now.