|
|
|
|
|
by wolverine876
1585 days ago
|
|
> with this much money at stake, absolutely nothing, including courts, will present a balanced and evidence based view of things. EVER. Sorry you feel that way but what basis is there for believing it? What does it mean? Nothing is perfect, of course, but there are enormous differences between, e.g., an honest person (everyone lies) and a sociopathic fraud. And certainly we always need to read critically and think for ourselves - it's our duty as citizens, IMHO - again that doesn't mean everything is so biased. In the past I would have just smiled at it and moved on, but now, with baseless despair engulfing our society, I am going to challenge it. The only thing we have to despair about is despair itself! |
|
You won't find honest men there at high noon with a flashlight.
Sure, honest men exist, but they don't have any real power or influence, and the congress doesn't care about their opinion: https://www.upworthy.com/20-years-of-data-reveals-that-congr...
Assuming everything is biased isn't despair. That's just the natural state of the world, and an axiom that has served me well.
Semper bonus homo tiro est.