[jobegrabber]

Even with a CS background, I would expect a blog post that is supposed to be a "A Critical Review" to at least try to be fair and reasonable.

It doesn't have to be neutral in my opinion. But it should clearly separate personal judgement or opinion from facts and overall rational.

In the "About me" section the author says:

>Originally I started this site attacking the big corporate interests (Google, IBM and VMWare) that drove this effort forward, but that really doesn’t speak to my intended audience. It also came off as acerbic, which I am fine with in regards to corporations and their CEOs, it does not do justice to all the engineers that slaved over the Kubernetes project. So I deleted those posts. Now, I just want to start, provoke, prod, or push a dialog forward, because if you just follow the tech blogs, you would think we should be running a Kubernetes cluster on our lawn mowers.

Even if the blog is not about simply "attacking the big corporate interests" anymore, the language clearly puts forward the post's agenda.

In my opinion, the post should have a different title, one that is clearly indicating the author's intention to highlight the negative things about Kubernetes and the documentary.