Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by bradknowles 1587 days ago
It would be great if we could sort on each of the respective fields.

And some fields need to have a "<" or ">" factor -- for example, I don't want to see any results that have less than 100 drives in the fleet. At those small sample sizes, they're still just testing them and not really buying them for real work.

1 comments

Thanks for the feedback, I can definitely add ranges to fields next!

I just updated the UI and now have a better filtering panel and also have column sorting.

Hmm. Looks to me like you're not doing a proper sort on drive capacity. 16TB should sort as larger than 160GB.

Whoops!

Haha thanks for catching that. Will be sorting that out now
Hmm. And now the filters box on the left hand side of the screen won't stay open for me. Every time I try to open it to select the check boxes for just the larger size drives, the box decides to close itself again.

Weird.

I get that sometimes too. I just refresh the page because I have no idea where that's coming from. It's definitely high on the list to resolve
And shortly after, I managed figure it out! Shouldn't be happening again
Cool! Thanks!

Now the only remaining weird thing I've noticed is that when I select a small handful of drive capacities in the filter selection (say, 14TB and larger), I get a nice small list in the main display. But when I try to sort that small list by any of the columns, it throws away the small list of drives and goes back to the full list which is then sorted by that column.

Not sure what's going on there.