|
|
|
|
|
by distances
1586 days ago
|
|
I disagree. That is an excellent throttling mechanism. Keeps records open but preserves a modicum of privacy. It's another topic if court records should be public at all, but I gather that's a pretty integral element of US judicial system. |
|
Either it's private or it's not. Fake throttling that discriminates based one's ability to pay or suffer inconvenience is ridiculous. Not to mention, it's been decades since this information hasn't been available in this format.