Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by berberous 1583 days ago
They are not ignoring the law: “And most importantly, we can’t even if we wanted to.” Sounds like they are a non-custodial wallet or similar.

While they may truly believe the law is amoral and are in part happy to make that statement, this is primarily a marketing stunt for the pro-privacy and unseizable aspects of self-custodied crypto wallets.

1 comments

They should have opened with the facts. Then put the meme. Plus, that wasn't even the best "no" meme to choose.
I’ve never heard of them and everyone in this thread now has. I think they succeeded with the marketing stunt. If they led with the facts it wouldn’t have been as viral as it leverages people’s extreme interest in this political issue.
I’d never heard of them. Now I have and know to never use them.