[Breazy]

> " Into their coffee shops and houses, the children were building their assumptions about ownership and the social power it conveys — assumptions that mirrored those of a class-based, capitalist society — a society that we teachers believe to be unjust and oppressive."

I share your take-away in general. But at least in this case though, the parents of these kids probably [publicly] align with the ideology of the teachers, although I think it's reasonable to suspect many of them privately have other opinions (I derive this belief from the fact that these are affluent white families who chose to send their kids to a primarily white and affluent after-school program. These families may talk the talk, but are they walking the walk?)

> Hilltop is located in an affluent Seattle neighborhood, and, with only a few exceptions, the staff and families are white; the families are upper-middle class and socially liberal.

[polished85]

What would "doing the walk" look like for these parents?

[Breazy]

Not going out of their way to put their kids into ethnically and culturally homogeneous environments.

[Aeolun]

I’m not sure if that’s fair. This may be the only afterschool program around, and have a representative percentage of children from all ethnicities in the neighborhood (e.g. mostly white).

I think it’s more likely they didn’t go out of their way to put them in more diverse environments.