[abernard1]

> Is this the new variation of value theory of labour?

I'm very confused here. The value theory of labour is based upon time spent in labour, and not value produced.

The argument was if for whatever reasons, the value produced before moving to Arizona allowed the employer to pay a certain wage, the value provided to the company is still the same post-move, and wages should not change.

This has nothing to do with the value theory of labour, and the employer's stance here more or less aligns with an "input costs determine output" theory of value. This is beyond silly.

[misslibby]

Presumably the value of remote work is not the same, then.