|
|
|
|
|
|
by tacLog
1576 days ago
|
|
|
> 65% This just isn't what the tweet shows?
Unless you are counting AdSense as sponsors? That doesn't seems to make sense. You seem to be saying LTT is beholden to their sponsors? There is always an argument to be made there but misrepresenting: floatplane, AdSense and other sources that I don't see how you can call sponsors, which make up another 33% seems very disingenuous. Unless I am misinformed about how AdSense works. |
|
|
Yes, I am going by Google's own definition of AdSense which describes them as "sponsored links". If revenue from sponsored links does not count as sponsorship revenue then to each their own.
>You seem to be saying LTT is beholden to their sponsors?
This is such a massive jump I have no idea if it's even worth responding to it. I have no idea how posting a link to a literal pie chart directly from a source can be construed as saying that said source is beholden to sponsors.
If there's anything disingenuous, it would be the idea that not mentioning floatplane which makes up a mere 4% of revenue is a form of misrepresentation. That said I will defer to Hanlon's razor on that one [1]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor