[Buttons840]

This attitude is too defeatist, and I'm not convinced. The OP's suggestion was that people would choose which other "favorite lists" or "indexes" they follow, this implies these are public. Who's going to follow someone who puts a StackOverflow clone filled with ads on their list? And if they do, and it shows in my results, I should be able to discover that someone I'm "following" has been compromised, and I'll unfollow them.

[Gigachad]

This would have been said a million times for social media and yet most large personalities are filled with paid sponsorships and no one really cares.

[RileyJames]

Are large personalities not “unique”, and followed for the uniqueness of their character?

Where as the “moderator of a filter” is followed on the basis of their output, the filter itself.

I don’t disagree with your statement, but I don’t find it a compelling counterargument to the suggested solution.