> Hard problem is who should pay for what work which a blockchain is not solving
Yes, this is one of the many hard problems.
I would be 100% behind MA if he used his influence, wealth and power to fund solving these hard problems.
Unfortunately, his and most of current funds are building Managed Blockchains that's just needless complexity where federated databases would have sufficed and been far more efficient (perf., cost, complexity)
That said, Decentralization is the future and will happen with or without him. Unfortunately he's going down in history as one of those who slowed down progress to make monetary gains.
Because you can offload much of the logistic behind it onto the chain. Otherwise you need a legal entity willing to work with banks and auditors. It's what gitcoin does.
Yes, this is one of the many hard problems.
I would be 100% behind MA if he used his influence, wealth and power to fund solving these hard problems.
Unfortunately, his and most of current funds are building Managed Blockchains that's just needless complexity where federated databases would have sufficed and been far more efficient (perf., cost, complexity)
That said, Decentralization is the future and will happen with or without him. Unfortunately he's going down in history as one of those who slowed down progress to make monetary gains.