|
|
|
|
|
by ericmay
1579 days ago
|
|
> Actually you were the one using the fallacy. Because you are attempting to demand an exact cutoff point, which is not necessary. The law does not need to define exact cutoff points ahead of time. Again this is incorrect. I have not “demanded an exact cutoff point” at any time. > Instead, the law can consider those questions, as they come, in a court case/trial. So in other words you’re making a claim and then your defense of that claim is “the law will decide in a court case”. Ok… lol. |
|
You said this "I asked at what point something crosses over "
This is literally you asking at what point something crosses over.