Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by bronson 1588 days ago
the article says “walking 50km as fast as possible takes nearly double the work and energy than running a marathon, even though the distance is just 8km longer”
2 comments

Yes, I meant "at normal speeds", not "as fast as possible". That's quite obviously what the statement I replied to was about.
I wouldn't trust this website. It's based around selling a fitness product, so there's a very good chance it's biased.

https://www.polar.com/en/grit-x

Both running and walking are fitness activities that are supported by their tracking hardware. In what way do you expect them to be biased?
Nah, seems like a content marketing piece, and frankly one of the better ones I've read recently.