[comradesmith]

I don’t think that’s a logical reading.

The point is that being raped shouldn’t have made her more likely to be caught.

I think this is a fair stance to take, as DNA from rape kits being used for future tracking of the raped is going to disincentivise the use of rape kits.

I want to live in a world with less sexual violence, and if rape victims can submit DNA evidence without having to worry about state tracking (and those kits actually be analysed) then I think we can get a step closer to that world.

[dzhiurgis]

> The point is that being raped shouldn’t have made her more likely to be caught.

So you are arguing police only collects DNA from only ethical sources of your liking?

Great equaliser would be collecting everyone's DNA at birth.