[nicoburns]

I feel like Firefox on Android should be more popular than it is. Chrome is default, but it doesn't offer an Ad Blocker. Firefox with uBlock origin is a far superior experience. Although there are other 3rd party chromium-based browsers that are just as good.

I suspect that it's poor market share is due the very poor performance of the older fennec implementation.

[jakub_g]

I tried to use FF on Android, and while it's capable and works rather well, perf-wise Chromium is just years ahead (I use Brave).

You can see it well on JS-heavy sites like Twitter, the difference is very easy to perceive with loading time, scrolling perf, and also with memory management (Firefox evicts pages from memory cache aggressively compared to Chromium; you sometimes switch a tab or switch an app, go back, and bang, it's gone and needs a reload); and I have a decent good phone (not top shelf, but a "high-mid" Pixel 3a, probably 60-70th percentile within Androids?).

[noselasd]

I can't use Firefox on mobile, its tab management is too annoying, that's the sole reason I abandoned it before christmas.

[selfhoster11]

I use Firefox mobile for the past 3 or so phones. To be blunt, it sucks. The only reason I haven't switched to a Chromium derivative is because I don't want to migrate my bookmarks, because they don't have as good ad blocking support, and out of sheer stubbornness.

[derbOac]

I came to say something similar. I'm a diehard Firefox user, and can articulate all sorts of things about it I love, but mobile has been hugely disappointing. I still use it but there's a massive discrepancy between Firefox mobile and desktop.

Desktop is great; not that there's nothing that could be improved, but I love it and do not want to switch for any reason.

Mobile has weird lags and hangs that I don't understand, and has this weird crippled extension system. Going into Nightly and adding some of them helps a little but not really. Its UI has been strange at times, and these little changes keep cropping up that I don't quite understand.

I still use it but I have thought about moving to something else, and the main reason I don't is because it's so convenient to sync between devices.

There was a big part of me that was suspicious that when mobile started becoming dominant, someone in Mozilla made a decision to migrate the mobile browser to something more advertiser-friendly to recoup funding, with the idea that the desktop would be the libre target and the mobile version would be the moneymaker. It just all feels so inward-focused and not user-focused, with crippled extensions and weird UI tweaks all the time.

[tgsovlerkhgsel]

It has gotten far better in the past years, although it still has some pretty crippling bugs and tiny yet incredibly annoying UX issues (e.g. can't easily wipe the cookies for the site you're currently on, try opening a URL from your clipboard in incognito).

But Firefox has gotten sufficiently close that the overall experience of Firefox with an ad blocker beats Chrome with ads.

[soundnote]

Brave's ad blockers are built-in, can do CNAME uncloaking and won't suffer from Manifest v3.

[marginalia_nu]

I've tried using it on Android and it simply doesn't work on my hardware. Takes minutes to load a page.

[akdor1154]

Since the re-architecture? Its pretty great now.

[marginalia_nu]

Tried it just now. From pressing the url bar to the keyboard showing up is a 2 second delay. Overall pages seem really unresponsive.

[nicoburns]

Out of interest, what hardware do you have? I had a Samsung S7, and the difference between Chrome and FF was minimal (Chrome was slightly faster, but only just). That's quite an old device, but I wonder if somehow it being a high-end device when it was new still counts for something...?

[marginalia_nu]

Cat S52. Although a 6502 managed to respond immediately to input 47 years ago, so I don't understand how a modern processor could struggle with this today.

[captn3m0]

I’d argue that FF could possibly convince some manufacturers to preload Firefox with uBlock installed as a faster browser (if UCBrowser could, surely FF can).

[JohnTHaller]

I'd wager that Firefox's deal with Google prohibits them from doing this on any platform.

[godshatter]

When you make a deal with the devil I guess you have to expect these sorts of things.