[giraffe_lady]

Something a company chooses to do is in fact about that company, even if they didn't create the pressure to do it or invent the practice, even if other people do it more or did it first, etc etc. They teach this in kindergarten so I know you know it. If Alex jumped off a bridge, that thing.

> It critiques working conditions without providing any context as to how these jobs compare to other low pay -or more likely even average pay- jobs in those countries.

What context could justify the global power imbalance that makes this economic relationship possible? The article is critiquing working conditions and power imbalances. I'm sorry it also doesn't take the time to explain and rationalize the economic injustice that created them.

You seem to using a liberal or neoliberal framework to understand this relation in terms of its individual actors and the economic incentives and consequences of them. The missing context here isn't more details about those actors and consequences, it's an exploration of why these factors are distributed the way they are and how to engage with that system.