| This is such a weird argument. Let's say those things are true (and I think they are reasonably true). - When an EU citizen requests a US internet resource, they provide a US server with their IP address - An IP address is PII (well, personal data as far GDPR is concerned, but that's a nitpick) - The CIA could record that I don't think how you would go to a conclusion from those that "it is illegal to provide any internet resource to anyone in the EU". First, it's worth noting that GDPR only applies to companies that specifically target its services at individuals in the EU. Targeting means having an EU office, using an EU domain, providing EU languages such as Polish or allowing payments in EU currencies. If your service makes no effort to provide service specifically for European users there is no need to worry about GDPR - even if you are in the US. Second, while US services targeting individuals in the EU are legally problematic, this doesn't affect other countries - so I see no reason to say "any" here. For example, a Japanese server is free to provide services at individuals in the EU provided they comply with GDPR as EU has an adequacy decision for Japan. Also, I would like to point out you can replace US with North Korea in this argument. I think it would be ridiculous to say that if European Union were to disallow sending personal data to North Korea (including IP address) then it would mean that it's illegal to provide any internet resource to anyone in the EU. |
Nope. There's only a single requirement: having EU users.