|
|
|
|
|
by randomswede
1584 days ago
|
|
Off the top of my head, I don't know. It MAY be related to the fact that 6*3 is 216, but I don't have deep enough statistics knowledge to say for sure. You coudl try it again with 3 8-sided dice and rolling 24, that should give you ~50% at 344 iterations, and ~90% at 1177 iterations. If my supposition that the mean is related to the possible rolls, then the mean should end up being 512. Iteration counts gathered with Python and a (manual) binary search (actually faster than writing code). |
|