Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by donmcronald 1594 days ago
1. Maybe. It's not so great if you publish something confidential.

2. No one is responsible for anything, you'll never get any support, and one day the decentralized consensus might be to abandon the whole system.

3. It takes 16 seconds for a transaction to post and the average transaction fee [a] is over $2. Cross-country money transfers (assuming you mean international) benefit money launderers and criminals a lot more than me.

4. I never understand this sentiment. Thousands of tokens have been invented to create hundreds of billions of dollars. If the federal reserve told everyone they could print their own fiat and have it accepted at the bank, what do you think would happen? Inflation, right? Think of it another way. If the liquidity for the market is fixed in the sense of the amount of fiat people are willing to bring in, then every token mined or minted is diluting the value of anything you're holding.

5. This is at the risk of losing your keys and your life savings. No thanks. Also, banks act as a backstop for a lot of things people don't even think about. They won't let you wire your life savings to Nigeria without trying to make sure you won't get scammed. The indemnify you from the risk of fraud if you're using a credit card. Money you give them is backed by FDIC (or similar) insurance, so if the bank fails your money is still there.

6. Like?

7. Yeah. I'm sure the super elite that control almost all of the money and assets on the planet are going to sit by and watch as the crypto community anoints themselves as the new rulers of the wealth.

And what happens in this utopia where everything can be anonymous and governments have lost control of the money supply? Does everyone stop paying taxes? Who funds the schools, hospitals, and all other infrastructure? Do you think the rich are going to suddenly become charitable and start funding everything? They already contribute as little as possible, so it's difficult to imagine a world where they'd contribute $1 if they aren't forced to do it?

> The fact that people still don’t get that in 2022 is astonishing.

We don't get it because it doesn't make sense. It might make perfect sense for those of you that mined millions of (on paper) dollars of crypto currency, but it's not a good deal for anyone else. It's objectively worse in terms of stability and predictability and the best outcome for us is to get a different set of wealthy elite that control everything.

a. https://ycharts.com/indicators/ethereum_average_transaction_...

1 comments

Your arguments are mostly usability. However, there are already many services that gives you additional utility such as insurance, backups etc.

Crypto already has replaced money in several countries, especially third world countries where it has replaced money for 30% of the population that have protected their funds against inflation thanks to the inherent scarcity of respective cryptos.