[randomhodler84]

It’s a dumb methodology;

I’ll give you an example, I bought at BTC $36k last month and just withdrew it from exchange after all the fiat cleared in from the legacy banking channel today. It hit the chain when BTC was $42k, so these jokers would think the cost was 42. You can’t get an accurate picture from on chain data alone.

[cyberge99]

Another major failure of the methodology is that it fails to take in to account all of permanently lost key/locked up BTC.

[listenallyall]

You can withdraw bitcoins from the blockchain? That would be fascinating new feature if it existed. /s

[randomhodler84]

I added “from exchange” for clarity. I would have thought the ref to legacy banking channel would be enough reason to imply I was interacting with a fiat to cryptocurrency exchange.

[listenallyall]

Other people are "dumb" and "jokers". But when you make a mistake, it's just missing clarity or the reader's fault for not picking up what you're implying. Ok, got it.

[randomhodler84]

Which mistake would that be?

[listenallyall]

The one that compelled you to edit your original post, obviously.

[randomhodler84]

Only because you said something. It wasn’t a mistake, it just some ambiguity implied source, enough for you to comment. I dunno man, I don’t know what to say. I will own up to a mistake but that I do not believe is qualified as such.