|
|
|
|
|
|
by s1artibartfast
1593 days ago
|
|
|
Interesting, I can see something being morally neutral or unknowable, but still don't understand the distinction between moral and moral obligation. If you know an action is moral but you are not doing it, you're acting is implicitly not moral. The only remaining conclusion is admission that do not act in a moral way. If I understand correctly, your distinction between moral and morally justifiable is just a matter of uncertainty of facts, and if more facts were known, it would become moral or not? Is that correct? |
|
|