[kkoncevicius]

A fitting quote:

"The error in depicting critics of animal experiments as anti-science becomes clear when one begins to question the extent to which the purported scientific aims of these experiments are actually accomplished. For then it turns out that the experiments and not their critics are unscientific. Those experiments that cannot be justified on scientific grounds can be no more justified than the frivolous killing and torturing of animals. In fact they are even less capable of justification, since such experiments block more fruitful uses of scientific resources."

-- Deborah Mayo

[diffeomorphism]

That quote is either really stupid or downright evil.

> Those experiments that cannot be justified on scientific grounds

Duh. Those experiments are also already illegal. So that quote either thinks that scienists are comic book villains that want to torture for fun (really stupid) or they want you to think that (evil).

[jeffparsons]

One of their nearest-term practical goals is to find a way to help paralyzed people to move again. Figuring out how to take people from quadriplegic to walking around seems like worthwhile science to me.

> [...] no more justified than the frivolous killing and torturing of animals.

Maybe Neuralink is doing something unethical. But this kind of rant makes the whole accusation way too easy to dismiss as the work of a crackpot. People that do stumble upon something unethical and feel the need to blow the whistle should probably keep that in mind and focus on the facts if they want to be taken seriously.

[inflagranti]

You mean like this: https://www.trtworld.com/life/breakthrough-nerve-stimulation...

[HPsquared]

Ah, the "no true scientist" fallacy. What does it mean to be "unscientific"?

[diamondo25]

Cannot be justified on scientific grounds? Surely they arent running this like what certain countries did in wars?

[cloutchaser]

You don’t know the end result of an experiment. That’s literally why it’s an experiment. /facepalm