| I'm sorry but this kind of calculation is handwavy to the point of absurdity. The author might as well be pulling this number out of a hat. 1. 25% chance for literal anything at all, sure, why not. 2. 66% reduction from vaccination plus booster (but requires booster) 3. 50% reduction from being asymptomatic early on and then this went up later,
combined with asymptomatic cases not being quite totally safe 4. 50% reduction from Omicron only, on precautionary principle 5. 50% reduction for sticking around 6. 0% reduction from the second sticking around reduction because I’m worried about 7. accidentally double-counting somewhere and want to be safe 7. 60% reduction for ‘as bad as all that’ based among other things on my survey 8. 25% reduction for misattribution to give benefit of the doubt 9. 0% impact of good health That gets us back to a 0.2% chance of Long Covid conditional on first infection, and less than that less for all future ones combined because of immune strengthening. |
This quote in particular seems rather ironic in light of the current labor shortage: "Do we see evidence of the types of sweeping changes we’d expect to see if several percent of people are suddenly unable to work? No, we don’t."